Blog

Insurance Providers – Simplify!

I received my term-life insurance statement earlier this month.  It’s a horrible piece of paper with codes, disclosures, and a “premium” on it.  It reminded me of our life insurance buying process.  That went something like this.

Wife:     Shouldn’t we have life insurance now that we have kids?

Me:        I guess.

Wife:     Can you look into it?

[Six months later]

Wife:     Did you look into life insurance?

Me:        Not yet.

Wife:     Don’t you love your children and want them to be secure if tragedy strikes?

Me:        Um, yeah.

Guilty, I embarked on a process to look up rates.  I called agents. I tried creating a spreadsheet with different providers and prices.  And the process was difficult; much harder than buying a new TV or car; similar to buying a home.  There were online questionnaires that ended with “Call this number now!” or worse (We’ll call you every day until you succumb and buy through us.).

A week later, I said exasperatedly, “It looks like we can just get a simple 30-year, $1MM policy through this company. I don’t really know if they’ll be around for 30 years or if the rate is the best.  Let’s just do it.”

Last week, I surveyed 10 friends and family members about their term life buying process.  Not surprisingly, nobody found the buying process easy.  I asked “What was hard about buying?”  Eight people answered with something similar to this, “Figuring out what kind to get and deciding whether or not it is really necessary.”

Now – I understand enough to know that the underwriting and risk management processes are complex.

But difficult back-office processes do not stop other industries from simplifying front-office experiences (do any of us understand how a Google search result works?).  In my research, I found numerous media outlets answering the “what” and “why” questions – like this CNN Money article.  Insurers have important, valuable products; and can ensure prospective customers understand what’s good and the product and what’s good about their product.  Take the first step and simplify.

How Much is a Domain Worth? Nope, Less.

When we launched Naissance, we tried to get the domain naissance.com.  We got in touch with the owner of the domain and received an e-mail response that stuns me to this day.

As a Sunday diversion, here’s that response, along with my thoughts as I read it.

Hi Michael,

Thank you for your enquiry.

A search for “naissance” shows approximately over 27,300,000 results from Google.

I’m pretty sure I’ll only care about one of those.  And isn’t more results actually a bad thing?  Less competition sounds much better.

Names such as naissance.com are very much in demand especially as there are more than 60 MILLION domain names currently registered.

60 million.  100 million.  2 billion.  Who cares?  I get that this is supposed to make me think “Wow!  I really need to buy this domain!”  But logically I can’t quite figure out how.

If you consider that just recently Fish.com sold for $1,020,000, MyPremierCard.com for $135,250, JMM.com for $55,000 and HorseSupplies.com $52,500 etc there have been many other 5 figure sales – I’m sure that our asking price could be considered an investment for a domain of this quality.

This is my favorite part of the e-mail.  I laughed out loud when I read it.  Fish.com?  I’m not sure there’s a less similar domain or business.  And take a minute to check out HorseSupplies.com, I think it’s fair to say the buyer got ripped off.

The price of this domain is £16,500 Great British Pounds or US$27,820 (close offers may be considered).   This is a one off payment for the rights to the domain, however you will be responsible for paying the yearly registration (approx $30).

$27,820.  Seriously.  Our counteroffer?  $200.  It was not considered “close”.

The thing that puzzled me most is that shifts in technology continue to make the actual domain you have less and less important.  Browsers and search engines will find you, if you deserve it, without a perfect domain.  In fact, after a few weeks our site and Twitter feed both sit in the top 35 of 31.8 million search results for naissance. Not bad at all.

Oh, and if you’re interested, naissance.com is still available for purchase.

New Advisors Can Matter a Lot

Yesterday I had a conversation with a wirehouse advisor, Advisor X.  On the surface, he’s not someone an asset manager would focus on.  He’s:

  • New, with just one year of experience under his belt
  • Managing a book of business in line with his experience

If you asked most firms, Advisor X would not be someone to prioritize.  And yet, he profiles as a good target.  Why?  There are several reasons, but the most important is his affiliation with one of the biggest-producing teams in one of the biggest-producing branches in the country.  He’s closer to top producers than most every wholesaler who comes to the office.

Week after week Advisor X sits in on wholesaler presentations alongside numerous other less-tenured advisors and others looking for a free lunch.  And he blends in.  Wholesaler after wholesaler fails to recognize that he is a potential gateway to the most attractive advisors in the office.

This situation represents a challenge for sales teams.  On a broad scale it requires:

  • Improved understanding of team dynamics among advisors
  • Effective segmentation and profiling of advisors
  • Extensive coaching of wholesalers to enable recognition of these opportunities

More tactically, however, it requires wholesalers to take simple actions and improve the way they decipher branch dynamics.  Identifying Advisor X can be done by:

  • Grabbing 5 minutes of a branch manager’s time to discuss newer staff
  • Using existing advisor relationships to get insight on potential up-and-comers

Established advisors know very quickly who will and won’t succeed.  They know Advisor X.  And since most firms know and target the same advisors, an investment in digging a level deeper can unearth opportunities other firms miss.

Nobody is talking about the five letter word

P-I-M-C-O.  There, I wrote it.  Bond flows continue to outpace equities. And PIMCO is taking a huge leap forward in market share.  But the scale became evident by reading an advisor’s suggested portfolio (WSJ id/pwd required).  In that article, Mr Malloon suggests investing nearly 40% of a model portfolio with PIMCO.  Obviously, let’s give credit where credit is due.  PIMCO is hitting on all cylinders if they’re readily convincing a long-term professional to allocate 40%.

Are executives elsewhere coming up with marketing strategies to counter-attack?  What steps could be taken?  Here’s a simple 4P review (product, price, promotion, place), with a focus on product.

  1. Product – Mutual fund products are closely tied to performance and we all know – nobody can guarantee performance.  Many industry insiders tie flows to performance.  The conventional wisdom is that the PIMCO funds are “killing it.”  Are they? Using Morningstar, PIMCO’s first fund ranks 23rd for 5-year return (see here).  There are 20 fund families outperforming.  Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and communications have to be careful to avoid supporting that message. Nonetheless, is there an opportunity to dispel the conventional wisdom?
  2. Price – Interesting idea – can a fixed income shop promote themselves as “the lower-cost way to fixed income investing?”  I think so (obviously some compliance perspectives will be necessary).  That’s an interesting strategy.  That firm will learn: what is the sensitivity to price for fixed income?  Also, how robust are the PIMCO margins – will they match the lower cost?
  3. Promotion – PIMCO, Bill Gross in particular, does this extremely effectively.  He’s on TV. He’s in the paper. He’s podcasting.  Developing a promotional platform to rival that is difficult, slow, and risky.  Nothing to see here.
  4. Place – Potentially the  best marketing opportunity is to find a channel or distribution partner that is looking to diversify AUM.  Probably, there are risk managers at each wirehouse firm calculating percentage of assets in PIMCO funds and subsequently signaling the potential danger therein.

There are additional considerations and approaches.  The first step is to acknowledge  the elephant in the room.  And that the elephant is hungry.  Is this the new normal?

RSS is Hugely Underrated

Yesterday we sent a quick Tweet out to both American Century and Vanguard regarding their blogs.  The reason?  Neither had the link to the blog’s RSS feed on the blog homepage.  We saw this as a missed opportunity.  Why do we think that?

First, let’s take a quick step back.  What is RSS?  It’s Really Simple Syndication, which I suspect means nothing to many of you.  So here’s how I think of it:  RSS is a way to browse all of content from all of the Web sites you read every day in a single location. No surfing from site to site.  No repetition of clicking links and the Back button, dodging pop-ups and advertisements.  If you have Outlook, most of the individual articles/content you care about can be sent directly to your Inbox just like any other e-mail message.  Sounds pretty good, right?

Want to see what's in the latest edition of "Investment News"? Use RSS to get it in your Inbox.

Yet, few people actually use RSS.  In fact, after 15 minutes of Googling the most recent statistic I can find about RSS adoption is this Forrester study from 2008 that pegs it at 11%.  And the news might be worse within financial services.  As part of a client project this summer I surveyed 25 financial intermediaries about technology.  Only 1 of them had even heard of RSS, and none used it.

There are good reasons why RSS has not lived up to its potential.  But that doesn’t mean its promise is lost.  A little promotion and simple education is all that’s needed.

For firms like American Century and Vanguard, educating clients about RSS makes sure the people you want to read your content will read it more often.  If you are an asset manager or insurer with content and people to reach, education on “what is RSS” can help.  After all, someone may not think to visit a blog or Web site regularly, but they’ll definitely be opening their e-mail.

And to their credit, American Century has the RSS icon on the homepage already* and Vanguard indicated they’ll be looking into it.

* It’s possible we went temporarily senile and completely missed the RSS icon on the American Century blog homepage.  But two of us spent several minutes explicitly looking for it and never saw it.  So, this is our story and we’re sticking to it.